An established web directory of sites leading to art and artists worldwide. Entries are searchable by state, country or alphabetically.
  Home | About  


The Beauty of an Abstract Painting

Posted by Shana Kewell | General | Wednesday 9 April 2008 7:13 am

The art of abstract painting began a very long time ago. Artists began this art several hundred years ago. In fact, you have probably seen some of the more famous abstract paintings before. You may recall a famous abstract painting created by Van Gogh. Picasso also had an abstract painting or two as well. Modigliani is also known for his abstract painting work. Because of these artists, and many others, the art of abstract painting has gained popularity in the modern world.

Now what exactly is an abstract painting? An abstract painting is defined in many ways. First off, an abstract painting does not depict reality like traditional paintings. In the beginning, most art was depicting a photographic or realistic expression of someone or something. But an abstract painting does not do this. The definition of an abstract painting is that an abstract painting does not depict objects in the natural world. Rather, an abstract painting uses colors and shapes in a non-representing and nonobjective manner. It can be of anyone, anything, or just nothing at all.

Native American Art Galleries

Posted by Arttu | General | Friday 23 November 2007 11:37 am

Music and art have been vital parts of the Native American culture. Native Americans have been using art as a form of expression for thousands of years. Most of the Native American art consists of symbols of animals and people. These symbols were made from different materials such as rocks, feathers, cloth, clay and fabric. Native America comprised of several tribes, which were and are even today, famous for their own works of art. For instance, hand woven blankets are considered as an important feature of the Navajo tribe for which they are well known. Native Americans loved to carve different symbols of animals such as walruses, eagles and bears. Walruses were mostly carved out of whale’s teeth whereas eagles and bears were carved out of rock. These various forms of Native American art are displayed in a number of Native American art galleries all over the U.S. and other places.

Native American art galleries feature the work of the most popular Native American artists who are highly skilled in designing art pieces reflecting their custom and ancestral roots. These art galleries mainly exhibit First Nations and Inuit art by displaying the work of artists such as Norval Morrisseau and Daphne Odjig, to name a few. Woven baskets and totem poles are also the two main forms of Native American art that are found in most of the Native American art galleries. The woven baskets have very interesting tribal patterns making them beautiful pieces of art that can also be used to store fruits and vegetables. Totem poles have been regarded as symbols of the Native American heritage and play an important role in their art culture. These poles are huge wooden sculptures that represent generations of family members including the faces of people as well as animals. There are also various stone sculptures, jade carvings and Navajo jewelry found in these art galleries along with other beautiful crafts such as ceramics, masks, drums and carvings in cedar and whalebone.

Since Native American art also features Indian art and is considered extremely authentic, the majority of this art is not found in American art galleries or retail stores. They are found only in Native American art galleries, which specialize in showcasing Native American art.

The Digital Art Stigma

Posted by Sharon | General | Thursday 6 September 2007 5:52 am

Digital art – not real art, right? Do you reckon you could do the same, if you had just enrolled in one of Adobe’s Photoshop courses? And maybe had a couple of thousand dollars to spend on cameras, and computers? We don’t mean to downplay your technical abilities, or your own special talents, but we do want to show you how digital artists create something unique, beautiful and touching, just as much as physical artists do.

It seems to be a generally held perception that digital art, whether it is photography of the real world, or manipulation of reality, can be made by anyone… and therefore, why should you pay for it! Digital art has its own special skills required – fusing technical expertise with craftsmanship is not easy! And you can see so much of the artist in the art, just like you can in a painting, or a sculpture.

You see fears, dreams, hopes, random thoughts, and the world as another person views it, just as much as Michelangelo or Picasso showed us these hallways in their own minds. If you can break down this barrier in your own mind, you will be opening yourself up to a whole new world of art, seeing beauty in the straight line and form in the cursor’s movement…

Unfortunately, not everyone has the facilities to be able to buy a great camera, an excellent computer, a copy of Photoshop and enrol themselves in a course to learn how to use it. If everybody did, nobody would have this concept, that art comes from money! We will have to look at several parallel arguments, and extrapolate the original ones, to see if the conclusions we come to are still true…

If you are a parent, do you think you are good at your job? Do you think you are raising well-balanced kids, and you have a good understanding of their needs and their psyche? I hope you do! Now, did you do a course in child psychology? Have you read many books on parenting and child psychology? Do you have the money to provide everything they need, and would be great for their future development?

You may not, but we would never suggest that makes you a ‘fake’ parent – that would be unfair. Parenting, like art, is not about money – it is about something a bit deeper within, that comes a little more from your soul than your hip pocket. In the same vein, technical skills cannot be substituted for by money (in the form of good equipment).

David White agrees: ‘I think that most of us ascribe attributes, mistakenly in a lot of cases, to people based upon their possessions, whether it is automobiles or cameras’ (White, 2006). If you do a bit of cooking, do you think that you could make your favourite dishes just as well in an oven without a digital timer and thermostat control? Would losing your electric whisk make you a bad cook? We certainly don’t think so – we appreciate that the art of cooking is more about an instinct for flavour and texture, than the means you use to get to the end.

So, if having the best equipment doesn’t make somebody better at something, it follows that having worse than usual equipment shouldn’t dampen someone’s creativity, either. Van Gogh, along with many other artists, was not well-recognized in his time, and therefore he was not rich! He could not necessarily buy the best quality paints, or even enough paint to always have unmixed colors.

He could not necessarily buy high-quality canvas to materialize his vision – although this may have changed the dimensions of it slightly. Yet, he is now one of the most recognized and appreciated artists of the last centuries. His equipment had no bearing on his art – the feelings we get looking at his paintings and prints come from something other than the fibre ratios of his canvas, and the chemical composition of his paints.

Digital art requires a whole different set of artistic skills – you don’t necessarily need a delicate touch to mix colors, but you need an excellent eye to judge how the colors you click on will affect your work. You don’t need an awe-inspiring setting, but your mind needs to be in that awe-inspiring place, nevertheless.

You do still need to be a great judge of a model, and you do still need what so many of us mere mortals lack, which is an eye for balance, and intimate knowledge of how our mind works. When you know how people will perceive something, you know how to challenge it. You must be able to define beauty to create it.

JD Jarvis agrees that digital art is unique as an artistic genre. He explains how digital art can seem a little mundane, since we only have the same old words that we have always used to describe it. We use these words to help it become accepted, to lessen people’s fear of new and different things, but- ‘Such shortcomings in our use of language to describe digital imaging processes demonstrate, if nothing else, how unique these tools and their results truly are’ (Jarvis, 2006).